tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1802759141459573337.post6505701759126311367..comments2024-03-20T13:29:19.105-07:00Comments on Gripen for Canada: What about the Super Hornet?Doug Allenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10504832466775445050noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1802759141459573337.post-36831332222981494052013-04-07T08:47:25.139-07:002013-04-07T08:47:25.139-07:00Thanks or your comment!
Indeed, the Super Hornet ...Thanks or your comment!<br /><br />Indeed, the Super Hornet does improve on the legacy Hornet's range and endurance. I will make a change to reflect this fact. <br /><br />Given that the current Hornet's range has been considered "good enough" for the last 30 years, and that all the fighters under consideration either match or exceed the current CF-18's range, I don't Doug Allenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10504832466775445050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1802759141459573337.post-53230516987044047602013-04-07T04:26:04.591-07:002013-04-07T04:26:04.591-07:00hi, im new to your blog site. would like to commen...hi, im new to your blog site. would like to commend you for your objectivity.<br /><br />but something is amiss here in your article that you somehow must have forgotten to include with the super hornet's 36% fuel load increase: that it also brought farther a 40% increase in combat radius vis a vis legacy hornet.<br /><br />all in all, im with you in your argument for a cost-effective, great coldSTEELhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18153817444281868931noreply@blogger.com